I just devoured this article from today's New York Times on the starting age of kindergarteners. I think I mentioned previously it's something I have agonized over a bit. Either I start her in August as planned (and save myself $650 a month), or wait, and try to give her a developmental advantage over her classmates that she may not need. The part that I found particularly thought-provoking is this:
But perhaps those kids with the pencils in their ears — at least the less-affluent ones — don’t need “the gift of time” but rather to be brought into the schools. Forty-two years after Lyndon Johnson inaugurated Head Start, access to quality early education still highly correlates with class; and one serious side effect of pushing back the cutoffs is that while well-off kids with delayed enrollment will spend another year in preschool, probably doing what kindergartners did a generation ago, less-well-off children may, as the literacy specialist Katie Eller put it, spend “another year watching TV in the basement with Grandma.” What’s more, given the socioeconomics of redshirting — and the luxury involved in delaying for a year the free day care that is public school — the oldest child in any given class is more likely to be well off and the youngest child is more likely to be poor. “You almost have a double advantage coming to the well-off kids,” says Samuel J. Meisels, president of Erikson Institute, a graduate school in child development in Chicago. “From a public-policy point of view I find this very distressing.”
The article went on to point out that the youngest kids in the class, regardless of any arbitrary cutoff date, will always be the hardest to teach. We are vitims of the vagaries of the school calendar. So as states race to give their own kids an edge by pushing back the cutoffs to September 1st and earlier (as in Oregon where we almost had planned to start Kindergarten), it has a hugely disporportionate effect on the most disadvantaged of kids (what else is new, I guess).
Regardless, it did point out that the fact that we, as parents, are even strssing about this issue bodes pretty well for Amelie's future academic success. I hope that will be true. We'll see how it goes this year. If it's NOT going well, then, Greg can take a contract job in Europe or something and we'll just skip that year later on. :)
2 comments:
Hi Denise,
It's Lori, Greg's cousin. I just wanted to give you a bit of my experience with my children. My son's birthday is May and my daughter's is Oct. 28th. MY daughter is the youngest in her class. December 1st is the cutoff for kindergarten.
Arianna just completed 4th grade and acheived an overall average of 98%. She matched her best friend whose birthday is in December, making her friend the oldest in the class. I believe that if your child has a good foundation and parents that are involved in all aspects of their schooling, it will make a big difference.
My son just finished 6th grade and his age is in the middle of the class. He does very well and finished with a 90% average.
They both attend parochial school and have always done well. I have always stayed on top of things when it comes to school. I feel that the school, the teacher and the parent all contribute greatly to how your child performs.
Things have changed so much since we went to school. When my son went to kindergarten, I thought that the teacher was pushing too much on them at such a young age. But my children rose to the occasion and I realized then how much things have evolved in school.
I just wanted to give you some of my experience. Good luck with whichever decision you decide to make.
Lori
Thanks for that, Lori!! I appreciate it! :)
Post a Comment